ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS

RS-701; McMaster University, Term I, 2006 – Tuesday 1:30, UH 122
Annette Yoshiko Reed (Dept. of Religious Studies; UH 110)

***The below information is tentative! Please check back for further updates. Note, too, that a final version of the syllabus will be circulated at the first seminar meeting.***

This seminar is required of all incoming students and offers a forum for the discussion of issues central to the field of Religious Studies. This year, there will be two sections, one taught by myself and the other by Dr. Travis Kroeker. This section of the 2006 seminar will focus on the theme "Text, history, myth, and rite: Theories for the interpretation of religious belief and practice."

As clear from the configuration of McMaster’s own Department of Religious Studies, our field is hardly univocal or univalent. The study of religion(s) involves the investigation of beliefs, practices, experiences, scriptures, rituals, communities, institutions, ideas, identities, discourses, strategies, conceptual and social systems, intellectual and social histories, and much else. Accordingly the disciplinary canopy of “Religious Studies” covers a diverse range of methods, including historical, textual, literary, philosophical, theological, ethical, political, anthropological, sociological approaches. Methodological diversity and experimentation are, arguably, hallmarks of the field. No single genealogy can describe its diachronic development, no simple map can sketch its synchronic scope.

With this context in mind, this seminar will introduce students to some of the most prominent and provocative voices in the broader conversation about methodologies for the secular study of religion(s). We will revisit past thinkers and theorists who have had a formative and enduring influence on the conceptualization of “religion” as an area of teaching and research in the (post-)modern university. In the process, we will explore how the history of research on religion(s) has been shaped in response and reaction to developments in fields such as Philosophy, Linguistics, Sociology, Anthropology, and Literary Criticism.

To converse across these disciplinary lines—and to make the most of the diversity within our own discipline—it is important to have a critical self-consciouness about the assumptions that we bring to our own scholarship. Hence, this seminar will focus on the act of scholarly interpretation. We will consider different hermeneutics that are brought to bear on religious texts, histories, myths, and rituals, and we will interrogate their epistemological presuppositions, discuss their concepts of “religion,” and explore their profits and pitfalls.

Course Requirements

Seminar participation and weekly responses (20%) - Perhaps needless to say, you are expected to complete ALL the assigned readings for each seminar session and to be prepared to engage in discussion about them. Inasmuch as there are no papers assigned for this course, there will be a good deal of assigned reading; careful and thorough completion of these readings is critical!

There will also be several informal writing assignments aimed at facilitating discussion. Before the first meeting of the seminar, students should type up a brief (at least 2 pages) intellectual biography, describing their background and interests, what they study and why, whether/where/how they see themselves fitting within the broader field of Religious Studies, and how – on the onset of graduate study at McMaster – they conceive of “religion” and its academic study within a university setting. Like the field of Religious Studies at large, our department encompasses faculty and students from a broad variety of academic and personal backgrounds, and a correspondingly broad variety of approaches to (and assumptions about) the study of religion(s). In my view, this diversity provides us with a wonderful opportunity in this seminar to investigate and explore -- as well as to challenge, press, and problematize -- the history and practice of scholarly reflection on religion(s) in terms of its relevance for research and teaching in a wide range of different subfields of Religious Studies.

In addition (and in the same spirit) each student should type up brief (at least 2 paragraphs) responses to each week’s readings -- thoughts, ideas, points of interest, critiques, questions – to be circulated via email before each class (= by midnight on Monday) to the instructor and other seminar participants. This is meant to be an informal forum and an opportunity freely to explore and express ideas, concerns, and questions raised by the readings. Students will not be graded on the content of these responses, but the prompt submission of these responses is considered to be an important part of participation in the seminar.

Book review presentation (25%) - Students will be assigned a book from THIS LIST on which orally to present. Presentations should be 10-15 minutes in length and should summarize the book, guided by the aim of communicating to your fellow students its significance for the study of religion(s), past and present, and its connections with the overarching themes discussed in the seminar and with the other readings. Hence, you need not linger on details like the biography of the author; focus on the book and its argument. After summarizing the book and its main and most relevant points, you should feel free to voice critiques and to raise questions. It is important, however, that each book be understood and explained on its own terms before any judgements or valuations are made.

You are encouraged to choose a book from a field/sub-field which is new to you and/or which represents an approach very different from the one(s) in which you were trained. This is meant to be an opportunity for you to familiarize yourself with approaches and areas that you may not otherwise get a chance to explore in the rest of your graduate career, during the course of specialist training in your own sub-field.

Presentation in Joint Session (25%) - This year, our 701 seminar will be split into two separate sections because of the size of the incoming class. Although the sections will have different readings, assignments, etc., we will hold five Joint Sessions. Each will focus on one or two theorists and will be organized on the analogy of a conference panel: each will feature 4-5 student presentations, which will include thematic papers as well as responses. Each student will be responsible for one of these presentations, so as to ensure that all of our various voices contribute to the larger conversation as well as to our ongoing discussions in each seminar section. For the specific topics of these presentations, click HERE.

Syllabus project (30%) - In lieu of a final paper or other formal writing assignments, students will submit in the last session of the seminar three syllabi: [1] a syllabus for an introductory undergraduate course on Methods in the Study of Religion, [2] a syllabus for a graduate seminar on Methods in the Study of Religion, and [3] a syllabus on for an advanced undergraduate course any topic pertaining to their own field, articulated in a manner informed by theoretical concerns. In creating the first two syllabi, you may choose to survey the entire field or to focus on a single theme or question, as long as multiple approaches are reflected.

Readings

The books that will be the focus of the Joint Sessions are all available for purchase at Titles Bookstore:

  • George Bataille, The Accursed Share, Vol. I: Consumption, trans. R. Hurley (New York: Zone Books, 1991).
  • Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice, Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology 16 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977).
  • Jacques Derrida, The Gift of Death (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)
  • Claude Levi-Strauss, The Savage Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966).

    In addition, a number of assigned readings will be taken from the following volumes, which students may also wish to purchase:

  • R. Kearney and M. Rainwater, eds., The Continental Philosophy Reader (London: Routledge, 1996).
  • Mark Taylor, ed., Critical Terms for Religious Studies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
  • Sumner B. Twiss and Walter H. Conser, Jr., eds., Experience of the Sacred: Readings in the Phenomenology of Religion (Hanover: Brown UP, 1992)

    With regard to other readings, students will be responsible for procuring them from the library, copying them, etc., as needed. Many of the articles can be accessed via our library’s E-Resources (e.g., JSTOR article database for Humanities and Social Sciences, ATLAS bibliographical database for Religious Studies, Project Muse collection of recent journal issues on-line -- to access these resources from off-campus, see information HERE.



  • Religious Studies 701: Issues in the Study of Religions
    Home | Readings | Presentations | Joint Sessions
    Annette Yoshiko Reed - Email | Homepage

    McMaster University || Department of Religious Studies